Arvid Carlson, pharmacologist, won the nobel prize for Medicine in 2000. In the 1970s he led a successful campaign AGAINST fluoridation in Sweden. In 2000, he wrote:
“Sweden rejected fluoridation in the 1970s. Our children have not suffered great tooth decya, and in turn, our citizens have not borne the other hazards fluoride may case. In any case, since fluoride is readily available in toothpaste, you don’t have to force it on people.”
Fluoridation’s days are clearly numbered — the New Zealand Supreme Court has ruled that fluoridation is “medical treatment” without consent (yes!), and with the mounting evidence that it is ineffective and carries significant health risks, it is now time for this to stop.
Read more about this momentous ruling here: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1806/S00336/fluoridation-is-mass-medication-nz-supreme-court-rules.htm
See the presentation here Paul Connett gave to New Zealand official here:
Major U.S. Government-Funded Study Should End Fluoridation Worldwide.
Some highlights from the presentation….
What does this mean for our children?
What effect does the lowering of 5 IQ point on the whole population have?
You have the number of “Very bright” people, and DOUBLE the number of “intellectually impaired” people!!
How do our governments get the science wrong? Because scientists who are doing analysis are getting the science wrong! And the governments are relying on them to provide an accurate analysis.
And what was the American Dental Association’s (ADA) response to the latest study in 2017?
Ridiculous. The American Dental Association has been corrupted, and should not be sought for advice any longer.
The science doesn’t lie….
The ADA said that the 2017 Bahash study, as well as the others studies that have been conducted are not applicable to the United States, because they weren’t done in the United States? Let’s check that statement. As you can see, the mean level of fluoride in the locations studied was 3.52ppm. That is LOWER than the fluoride level in fluoridated locations in the United States. So, the ADA statement is FALSE. The ADA has been corrupted.
PLUS, the ADA is confusing CONCENTRATION with DOSE. The dose of fluoride one will ingest will depend upon
- how much water one drinks per day
- the size of the person (children and babies are much smaller!)
- and how much fluoride one is getting from other sources per day
And what is the science the pro-fluoridators use to argue FOR fluoridation?
Fluoride is not a nutrient – it is not a medicine – and it does not prevent tooth decay. Proponents of fluoridation admit that fluoride is a substance used to medicate the public, allegedly to shrink the epidemic of cavities. But medication of the public via the water supply is banned by federal law. How then, is it still allowed? Great question!!!
In the United States, the Fluoride Action Network has made impressive progress in their lawsuit against the EPA in an attempt to end fluoridation. Read the details here: http://fluoridealert.org/articles/newsbud-interviews-paul-michael-connett-on-tsca-fluoride-case/.
Make a donation to the Fluoride Action Network so that they can continue this critical work and have even more support as they prepare for their momentous court hearing in their lawsuit next August, 2019.
You can read previous posts about fluoride here:
Check out this presentation series: